Control Panels
Transformer Sizing and Full-Load Current
Primary and secondary full-load current for a transformer, plus the approximate available fault current at the secondary from the impedance.
Calculated reference results
- Primary full-load current
- 54.1A
- Secondary full-load current
- 124.9A
- Approximate available fault current at the secondary
- 2,498A
- Approximate fault current
- 2.5kA
Assumes an infinite primary source, so the real figure will be lower. Use it as a conservative upper bound for SCCR, not as a study result.
The arithmetic
- Constant = 1.732 (three phase)
- Primary FLA = 45.00 kVA x 1000 / (1.732 x 480 V) = 54.1 A
- Secondary FLA = 45.00 kVA x 1000 / (1.732 x 208 V) = 124.9 A
- Fault current = 124.9 A / 0.0500 = 2,498 A
What this does not account for
- The fault current figure assumes an infinite primary source and ignores primary and conductor impedance. It is deliberately conservative. A real short-circuit study accounts for the utility contribution, conductor impedance, and motor contribution, and produces a lower number.
- Do not use this figure to justify a panel short-circuit current rating without a proper study. NEC 409.110 requires the panel to be marked with an SCCR, and 110.24 requires the available fault current at the service to be documented.
- Transformer secondary conductor and overcurrent protection rules are in Article 450 and 240.21(C), and are not covered here.
How this is calculated
Transformer full-load current is the kVA rating multiplied by 1000, divided by the voltage, and divided again by 1.732 for a three-phase transformer. Approximate available fault current at the secondary is the secondary full-load current divided by the per-unit impedance, which assumes an infinite primary source and therefore gives a conservatively high figure.
Formulas
FLA = (kVA x 1000) / (1.732 x V) for three phase
FLA = (kVA x 1000) / V for single phase
I_fault = FLA_secondary / (%Z / 100)
Assumptions and limitations built into this calculator
- Fault current assumes an infinite primary source, which overstates the real value.
- Ignores conductor impedance between the transformer and the point of interest.
- Ignores motor contribution to fault current, which adds to the total during the first cycles.
Frequently asked questions
- Is this a short-circuit study?
- No. It is a conservative first-pass estimate. A study accounts for the utility source, conductor impedance, and motor contribution, and is what an engineer seals when one is required.
- Why does lower impedance mean higher fault current?
- Impedance is what limits current during a fault. A 4% transformer lets through more fault current than a 6% transformer of the same rating, which is why the nameplate impedance matters for equipment ratings.
Direct contact
Have a controls question?
Reach Eric Sullivan directly about anything on this site, a controls or automation topic, or one of his personal projects.