Skip to main content
Call Eric:863-698-8266
CURRYCONTROLS.COMControls & Automation Knowledge Hub
ReferenceSCADAHMIDesignEngineeringCybersecurity

Other Platforms

The SCADA and HMI products a water utility may meet beyond the common ones: Siemens WinCC, distributed control systems, independent SCADA products, hosted lift station monitoring, and open-source tools, and the questions that decide whether one belongs.

8 min readUpdated Sep 5, 2026Published Sep 5, 2026By Eric Sullivan

The short answer

Other Platforms

Beyond the platforms with their own pages, a utility meets others: Siemens WinCC inside European packaged equipment and at plants standardized on that ecosystem; distributed control systems from the process industries at large regional plants; independent SCADA products with regional strongholds; hosted monitoring services that put a cellular unit at a lift station and a portal on the web; and open-source tools that appear in pilots and small systems. None of them is wrong in itself. The questions are the same for every platform: whether it will be supported and staffed for the life of the plant, how it is licensed, whether its history and configuration can be exported, how it handles redundancy and remote access securely, and whether the local integrators and the utility staff can maintain it at two in the morning without the vendor.

Key points

  • Siemens WinCC, distributed control systems, independent SCADA products, hosted services, and open-source tools all appear in water systems.
  • Judge a platform on support life, staffing, licensing, data portability, redundancy, and secure remote access.
  • A hosted monitoring service is a contract and a dependency, not just a product; know what happens when it ends.
  • Open-source tools need the same backups, security, and ownership as commercial ones, and a person who owns them.
  • Standardize: one plant HMI and, where needed, one telemetry SCADA, with a written exit plan for each.

Platforms you may meet

PlatformWhereNotes
Siemens WinCCPackaged equipment from European manufacturers; plants standardized on SiemensSeveral products under one name: panel HMI, plant SCADA, and a large distributed version; integrates most directly with Siemens controllers
Distributed control systemsLarge regional treatment plants and plants with process industry heritageControllers, I/O, and operator interface as one engineered system from one vendor; different staffing and lifecycle model from SCADA
Independent SCADA productsRegional strongholds and specific integrator basesSome are excellent; the questions below decide whether one belongs in your utility
Hosted monitoring servicesLift stations, wells, and tanks at small utilitiesA cellular unit at the site and a vendor portal; alarms by text and phone; monitoring more than control
Open-source SCADA and dashboardsPilots, small systems, and utilities with software staffNo license cost; all the responsibility
Cloud SCADA offeringsEmerging at small and medium utilitiesThe platform in a vendor cloud with local gateways; the security and dependency questions are the whole decision

Hosted monitoring services

A service that installs a cellular unit at a lift station, brings the floats, the run status, and the level to a web portal, and calls the operator when the wet well is high is attractive to a utility with no SCADA and no staff to run one. It is monitoring rather than control, the data lives with the vendor, the unit is theirs, and the contract decides what the utility gets if it ends: the data export, the equipment, the alarm history. It suits a small utility as a first step and remains useful as a backup path for critical sites; it is not a substitute for a utility-owned SCADA at a plant or on a system that needs control.

Open-source tools

Open-source SCADA products, dashboard tools, and protocol libraries can build a working system at no license cost, and some utilities with software staff do. The system then has no vendor to call, no support lifecycle but the community, and every question of security, redundancy, backups, and updates answered by the utility itself. A pilot on a test network is a fine use; a production system on open-source tools needs a named owner, a documented build, the same change control as any other SCADA, and a plan for the day the owner leaves.

The questions

Support life
Will the product and its drivers be supported and patched for the life of the plant, and who provides that support locally.
Staffing
Can the utility staff and the local integrators maintain it, and is training available.
Licensing
Perpetual or subscription; by tag, by client, by server; what stops working when a subscription lapses.
Data portability
Can the history, the alarm log, and the configuration be exported in a standard form, and has anyone tried.
Redundancy
What server and communication redundancy it offers and how it is tested.
Remote access
How operators reach it from outside, and whether that can be done behind a virtual private network with multi-factor authentication.
Security
Accounts and roles, audit trail, patch cadence, and secure protocols to the field.
Exit plan
What the migration to another platform would take, written down while nobody needs it.

Frequently asked questions

A vendor wants to put our plant on their cloud SCADA. Should we?
Only after the questions above are answered in writing: where the data lives, what runs locally when the internet is down, how the field connection is secured, how the contract ends, and what the utility owns. Local control must not depend on the cloud, and the security review is the decision.
The packaged system came with its own HMI. Do we integrate it or replace it?
Integrate it: the skid keeps its own controller and touchscreen, and the plant SCADA reads the interface the manufacturer documented. Replacing the skid HMI voids the support for the equipment and takes on logic the plant does not own.
Is a distributed control system overkill for a water plant?
For most plants, yes; for a very large plant with complex chemical and biological processes and a staff used to the model, it can be right. It is a different procurement, lifecycle, and staffing model, and it should be chosen deliberately.
How do we evaluate an independent product we have not heard of?
References from utilities of similar size that have run it for ten years, a look at the integrator base within driving distance, the licensing and support terms in writing, and a test of exporting history and configuration.

Direct contact

Have a controls question?

Reach Eric Sullivan directly about anything on this site, a controls or automation topic, or one of his personal projects.